Did the care meet the standard? CirclAI reads the record and tells you.

CirclAI analyses patient records, incident reports, and clinical guidelines — then maps the care pathway, identifies where duties were breached, traces causation, and flags governance gaps across your organisation.

Analyse your clinical documents View Pricing

The problem

Clinical governance teams investigate incidents after they happen. They should see the patterns before.

Serious incident investigations, complaint responses, CQC inspections, clinical negligence claims — they all ask the same question: was the duty of care met? CirclAI reads the clinical record and maps every care event against the relevant guideline. It identifies where the standard was met, where it was breached, and whether the breach caused the outcome. For governance teams, it detects patterns across multiple incidents that no single-case investigation would reveal.

How CirclAI helps

Care Pathway Audit

Upload a patient record and CirclAI maps every care event chronologically — admissions, handovers, investigations, decisions, discharges — against the relevant clinical guidelines. Where was the standard met? Where was it breached?

Governance Gap Report

Upload your trust policies and incident reports. CirclAI maps each policy against CQC regulations and NICE guidelines, and flags where your practice evidence is missing.

Serious Incident Summary

Upload investigation documents and CirclAI generates a structured summary: what happened, what should have happened, where the breach occurred, and whether it caused the outcome — with every finding cited to the clinical record.

Incident Pattern Detection

Across multiple incidents, CirclAI identifies patterns — same ward, same handover gap, same missed investigation — that single-case reviews miss.

Clinical Negligence Brief

For medical negligence claims: duty, breach, causation, outcome — mapped with source citations for both claimant and defendant positions.

What CirclAI extracts

●

Care Events

Emergency admission 14:22, consultant review 08:30

●

Duties of Care

Assess within 4 hours of admission, follow NICE NG12 sepsis pathway

●

Breaches

No senior review within 14 hours, CT scan not ordered despite indication

●

Clinical Guidelines

NICE NG51, CQC Regulation 12, GMC Good Medical Practice

●

Governance Gaps

No documented escalation protocol for deteriorating patients

●

Causation Links

Earlier diagnosis would have avoided ICU admission on balance of probabilities

Example: Serious Incident Investigation — Delayed Diagnosis

✓ Care Pathway: 23 care events mapped from A&E presentation to ICU transfer — 14-hour gap between initial assessment and senior review

✓ Duty of Care: NICE NG51 required CT scan within 1 hour of presentation — scan ordered at hour 16

✓ Breach: 3 departures from accepted practice identified — delayed senior review, delayed investigation, inadequate handover documentation

✓ Causation: on balance of probabilities, earlier diagnosis (within 4 hours) would have avoided ICU admission — patient deteriorated during delay period

✓ Governance Pattern: 2 previous incidents on same ward involved delayed senior review — systemic issue, not isolated failure

Analyse your clinical documents

14-day free trial · No credit card required